Re: Re[2]: A third posting.../LONG MESSAGES?

Richard Tinsley (mailto:rtinsley@LAMAR.COLOSTATE.EDU)
Wed, 12 Apr 1995 10:36:24 -0600

Message-ID:  <Pine.A32.3.91.950412103438.41529C-100000@lamar.ColoState.EDU>
Date:         Wed, 12 Apr 1995 10:36:24 -0600
From: Richard Tinsley <mailto:rtinsley@LAMAR.COLOSTATE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Re[2]: A third posting.../LONG MESSAGES?
To: Multiple recipients of list DEVEL-L

Correct me if I am wrong, but once it is in your inbox, you are already
charged with the volumn for it, if you are on a time and volumn charge
basis.  Thus no saving in cost by not reading long message, only
opportunity for saving is keeping positng short.

On Wed, 12 Apr 1995 mailto:GOOZNER.ALAN@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV wrote:

> My message headers give me a length in bytes of each
> message. If the topic does not suit your interest may I
> suggest for you to simply delete it?
>