Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.950412103438.41529C-100000@lamar.ColoState.EDU> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 1995 10:36:24 -0600 From: Richard Tinsley <mailto:rtinsley@LAMAR.COLOSTATE.EDU> Subject: Re: Re[2]: A third posting.../LONG MESSAGES? To: Multiple recipients of list DEVEL-L
Correct me if I am wrong, but once it is in your inbox, you are already charged with the volumn for it, if you are on a time and volumn charge basis. Thus no saving in cost by not reading long message, only opportunity for saving is keeping positng short.
On Wed, 12 Apr 1995 mailto:GOOZNER.ALAN@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV wrote:
> My message headers give me a length in bytes of each
> message. If the topic does not suit your interest may I
> suggest for you to simply delete it?
>