Message-ID: <200001301432.JAA32518@pilot009.cl.msu.edu> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 09:32:55 -0500 From: Donald Z Osborn <mailto:osborndo@pilot.msu.edu> Subject: Re: Trees & surface storage of water To: mailto:DEVEL-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
<pre>
Thanks for the info. Can you tell me where to get more details?
I'm particularly interested in any info anyone has on research on measuring the
effects of windbreaks & shade trees on evaporation rates. TIA! DZO
> Yes, the US Department of Agriculture had its LA 2000 program, where they did
> just this.
>
>
>
> Donald Z Osborn <mailto:osborndo@PILOT.MSU.EDU> on 01/28/2000 12:19:05 PM
>
> Please respond to Donald Z Osborn <mailto:osborndo@PILOT.MSU.EDU>
>
> To: mailto:DEVEL-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> cc: (bcc: Michael O. Patterson/HSNG/HAR/HUD)
> Subject: Trees & surface storage of water
>
>
>
> Surface storage of collected / harvested rainwater in arid climates is
> obviously less expensive than storage in tanks or cisterns, and offers easier
> access to water than drawing / pumping from wells. However, water loss due to
> evaporation is likely to be high. Has any work been done on use of trees for
> windbreaks and shade in order to reduce direct sun, air temperatures, and wind
> velocity and thus decrease losses from evaporation?
>
> Presumably since trees in proximity to a retention pond might effectively pump
> a significant amount of water out of it (and probably no amount of
> micro-climate effect could reduce evaporation enough to overcome the amount
> taken up & transpired by the plants) one would also have to be talking about
> lining the pond somehow to limit infiltration and the pumping effect.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Donald Zhang Osborn, Ph.D. mailto:osborndo@pilot.msu.edu
> consultant mailto:@ NRMP-Assistant-Mali@icrisatml.org
> ANRM, IK, & ICT in the vernacular mailto:bisharat@go.com
>
>
</pre>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 30 2000 - 09:26:00 CST