Message-ID: <MAPI.Id.0016.00776562202020203030303430303034@MAPI.to.RFC822> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 12:30:04 PDT From: uwe <mailto:uweb@MEGALINK.NET.MX> Subject: Re: BAD EXPERIENCES etc.. To: mailto:DEVEL-L@AMERICAN.EDU
Hi Eberhard,if you look again at my original message, you will find out that I don't even take a position in this whole discussion. he reason for this is very simple: I don't know enough to take position. So I want to learn from it, and that's why I wa happy when I saw that it was cooling down. While it is still a "hot" emotional arguing, what could one learn? And if w don't learn, what could we improve? Besides, the composition of your message makes me think in the possibility that you confused me with somebody else, who perhaps was a little too emotional.
Uwe Did you see the comments Natalie Pauwels wrote? I like the style, though I'm still not in the position to judge.
---------- >
> In message <mailto:MAPI.Id.0016.00776562202020203030303430303034@MAPI.to.RFC822>, uwe
> writes:
>
> > finally this discussion is coolong down and becoming more
> > reasonable. Great! How nice would it be, if somebody could begin to
> > provide the answers to the below questions. Who is the first?
>
> Why are you saying this? It's the donors being unreasonable, not the
> recipients.