Message-ID: <9610050214.AA21057@riker.neoucom.edu> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 22:14:22 -0400 From: "Robert E. Pyke" <mailto:rep@RIKER.NEOUCOM.EDU> Subject: Re: your mail\technology and its perceived influence (fwd) To: Multiple recipients of list DEVEL-L <mailto:DEVEL-L@AMERICAN.EDU>
Forwarded message: Subject: Re: your mail\technology and its perceived influence (fwd) To: mailto:Devel-L@AMERICAN.U.EDU Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 22:10:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset˙-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1109Forwarded message: Subject: Re: your mail\technology and its perceived influence To: mailto:gberlind@CRL.COM Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 22:06:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <mailto:199610050002.AA10111@mail.crl.com> from "Gary Berlind" at Oct 4, 96 05:00:55 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset˙-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 680
As a health care provider who is concerned about technology and its adapation,someone recently sent me the following comments on the perceived influence of technology and some of the data that emerged is interesting and can be applied to internatiional areas too!The six categories that emerged: 1.Utilization of a western tool 2.Generation of cultural attitudes 3.Exchange of global expertise 4.Implementation of interactive reality 5.Access ti infirmatiional power 6.Impications of time These are categories and should be treated as such,but I think it could be a topic to consider as the world becomes smaller and more complex. Thanks, Bob Pyke Jr.RN,CPNP mailto:rep@neoucom.edu.us