Re: Scanner vs. Digital Camera
Charling Chang Fagan (mailto:sha@MAIL.SLC.EDU)
Thu, 16 Apr 1998 12:00:55 -0400
Message-Id: <199804161620.JAA51020@dns.ccit.arizona.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 12:00:55 -0400
From: Charling Chang Fagan <mailto:sha@MAIL.SLC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Scanner vs. Digital Camera
To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
At 11:36 AM 4/16/98 -0400, Charling Chang Fagan wrote:
>At 09:10 AM 4/16/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>At 04:23 PM 4/14/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>>Greetings,
>>>
>>>A few weeks ago I sent a question to the list regarding your experiences
>>>with Minolta's EPIC 3000 and similar devices. I received several
>>>replies--thanks! Recently I had an opportunity to see this scanner
>>>first-hand and was quite impressed. But I am still in something of a
>>>quandary: I also learned recently of Leica's release of their S1 digital
>>>camera--paired with the proper imaging software it perhaps could be a
>>>viable alternative to an overhead scanner such as the Minolta. I was
>>>hoping someone might have some suggestions. Here goes:
>>>
>>>_Our Needs & Preferences_______________
>>>-Equipment to be used to image delicate materials; minimal contact
>>> desired between imaging equipment and materials; *no* flatbed or
>>> "roll-n-drag" (handheld) scanners would be acceptable.
>>>-Imaging quality of at least 400+ dpi desired for most projects; 600+
>>> dpi would be ideal.
>>>-Users of our department regularly request photographic or photocopy
>>> reproductions of items in our collections.
>>>-InterLibrary Loan access to our collections desirable. We use Ariel
>>> (if you aren't aquainted, Ariel is like a fax but uses internet
>>> transmission instead of telephone lines, for reproduction that is
>>> superior to fax) for electronic transmission of ILL requests.
>>> Currently only using flatbed scanners for Ariel requests; with
>>> non-flatbed imaging equipment could ariel [verb] delicate
>>> materials that now we cannot.
>>>-Color imaging needed for WWW exhibits. B/W imaging sufficient for
>>> text-only utilitarian imaging.
>>>
>>>_Pros & Cons of Minolta's EPIC 3000____________
>>>-Overhead scanner: minimal contact with materials.
>>>-Curvature correction software reduces image distortion of tightly
>>> bound volumes.
>>>-400 dpi maximum quality. Insufficient for archival-standard imaging
>>> but is best overhead scanner available.
>>>-Can deliver high-quality image printout when attached to laser or very
>>> good inkjet printer.
>>>-Can be incorporated into an Ariel-based electronic ILL delivery
>>> system.
>>>-Images of text could be run through an OCR program.
>>>-CON: B/W only.
>>>
>>>_Pros & Cons of Leica S1________________
>>>-Minimal contact with materials.
>>>-300-600+ dpi (varies according to size of material to be imaged and
>>> its distance from camera).
>>>-Color.
>>>-OCR? Ariel? Quick and easy printout?
>>>
>>>_Question RE: Leica S1________________
>>>Chances are that no one (or at least not many) users of this or any such
>>>list will have first-hand experience with a just-released $20,000
>>>digital camera. But I was wondering if anyone has had any success using
>>>a digital camera (preferably a good one) to image items that need to be
>>>OCRed? Sent by electronic ILL? Printed out for users? "Archived" as
>>>part of an image database? The fact that the Leica camera can make
>>>color images makes it a tempting alternative to the Minolta scanner but
>>>the scanner's features may offer more versitility. What would you
>>>choose?
>>>
>>>Sorry about the long message. Any information would be appreciated.
>>>Further info about the products described can be found at
>>>http://ows.minoltausa.com/minolta/owa/productlinelist?cat=ep&frame=N
>>>(for Minolta) and http://www.leica-camera.com/elec_img/eisys_e.htm (for
>>>Leica).
>>>
>>>--
>>>
>>>James A. Otto
>>>Digital Projects Specialist / ERes Manager
>>>The Libraries of The Claremont Colleges
>>>800 Dartmouth
>>>Claremont, CA 91711
>>>(909) 607-7530 (Special Collections)
>>>mailto:jotto@rocky.claremont.edu
>>>
>>>"So long as I am in my right mind there is nothing that I prefer
>>>to a delightful friend."
>>> --Horace, Satire I,5
>>>
>>>
>>I will be away from April 6th to april 15th. I will respond to all mail
>>when I return.
>>
>>
>I will be away from April 6th to april 15th. I will respond to all mail
>when I return.
>
>
I will be away from April 6th to april 15th. I will respond to all mail
when I return.