Re: SPECTRA Special Issue on Digital Imaging

From: Guenter Waibel (guenter@UCLINK4.BERKELEY.EDU)
Date: Wed Apr 26 2000 - 12:05:32 CDT

  • Next message: Andrew Stawowczyk Long: "Re: SPECTRA Special Issue on Digital Imaging"

    Message-Id: <200004261711.KAA17074@dns.ccit.arizona.edu>
    Date:         Wed, 26 Apr 2000 10:05:32 -0700
    From: Guenter Waibel <mailto:guenter@UCLINK4.BERKELEY.EDU>
    Subject:      Re: SPECTRA Special Issue on Digital Imaging
    To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
    

    <pre> Dear John,

    delighted to have you on board. What were you thinking about as a specific topic for your contibution? I am still looking for somebody who could write on the "economics" of digital imaging - the prize tag per image for direct capture with a cameraback vs a flatbed scanner, for capture from an original source vs capture from a 4x5 or a slide, and also a comparison between in-house digital imaging and giving your images out of house.

    A lot of museums these days have to decide how to capture their digital images: a cheap & fast way is to digitize already existing 4x5s or slides; some museums even create new 4x5s or slides for the express purpose of digitizing them since they don't have a digital cameraback. Others give their 4x5s out of house to get them digitized. If your article could shed some light on the financial and qualitative issues involved, it would be a great contribution. I could put you in touch with museums who give their images out of house if you need more info on that end.

    Just batting around ideas - let me know what you're thinking. Any other suggestions are welcome.

    Guenter

    >______________________________ Reply Separator
    >_________________________________
    >
    >
    >
    >Dear Guenter.
    >
    >I am the technical manager for the repro services in the British
    >Library and our
    >photographic section has been providing a commercial digital copying
    >service for
    >about three years during which time they have built up a fair amount of
    >expertise. We now have a lot more work than we can cope with
    >
    >I would be happy to write an article about the current service if you think it
    >would be of interest.
    >
    >Best regards
    >
    >John Fletcher - Head of technical services - British library
    >
    >
    >
    >>>> Guenter Waibel <mailto:guenter@UCLINK4.BERKELEY.EDU> 04/20/00 12:42PM >>>
    >Hi there,
    >
    >I'm looking for people interested in contributing to the Fall Issue
    >of Spectra, the Museum Computer Network's quarterly publication. The
    >issue will be dedicated to Digital Imaging. For those of you who are
    >not familiar with MCN and its publications, please check it out at
    >http://www.mcn.edu/spectra.htm. And yes, you don't have to be a
    >member to contribute:-).
    >
    >I see the Digital Imaging Special Issue as a very hands-on guide to
    >various topics in Digital Imaging ranging from image capture and
    >storage to administration and management. Any and all types of
    >approaches are welcome; topics that come to mind off the top of my
    >head: descriptions of workflows (e.g. the workflow of capturing &
    >administering collections inhouse - policies & procedures, standards
    >you established, guidelines), overviews over the state of the art
    >(e.g. comparison of different capture methods plus their prize-tag -
    >flat-bed scanning vs direct capture vs outsourcing), issues in
    >managing digital assets (e.g. tracking digital images in a database,
    >metadata issues), latest developments in File Formats (vector based
    >file formats, etc.), conservation issues with digital data
    >(standards), color management, etc. Please don't feel limited by
    >these suggestions - any and all ideas are welcome.
    >
    >The deadline for contributions will be August 1st 2000. As for the
    >size of the piece, I would say it could range from about 4000 to 8000
    >words, which should translate roughly into 3-6 Spectra-pages (more if
    >you have illustrations). If you have a longer contribution, I think
    >we can be flexible, too. The complete issue of Spectra usually has
    >about 50 pages. Ideally, you could give me an idea about a topic and
    >an approximate number of pages you would want to commit to. I am also
    >more than happy to brainstorm if you feel you want to contribute, but
    >haven't honed in on the "right" topic yet.
    >
    >I hope to hear from you!
    >
    >Guenter
    >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    >Guenter Waibel
    >Berkeley Art Museum & Pacific Film Archive
    >Digital Media Developer http://www.bampfa.berkeley.edu/
    >Digital Imaging SIG Chair, MCN http://www.mcn.edu/visig_subscribe.taf
    mailto:>guenter@uclink4.berkeley.edu
    >Phone 510-643-8655
    >Fax 510-642-4889
    >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Guenter Waibel Berkeley Art Museum & Pacific Film Archive Digital Media Developer http://www.bampfa.berkeley.edu/ Digital Imaging SIG Chair, MCN http://www.mcn.edu/visig_subscribe.taf mailto:guenter@uclink4.berkeley.edu Phone 510-643-8655 Fax 510-642-4889
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    </pre>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 26 2000 - 12:16:46 CDT