Re: [Q] Which Scanner for manuscripts

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Rochester Public Library: "Request for advice"
• Previous message: Robert Rosenberg: "Re: Resolution of devices"
• Maybe in reply to: Vineet Jain: "[Q] Which Scanner for manuscripts"
• Next in thread: Robert Rosenberg: "Re: [Q] Which Scanner for manuscripts"

Message-Id: <mailto:199408161725.MAA17040@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Tue, 16 Aug 1994 09:44:08 -0700
From: Raymond Lauzzana <mailto:lauzzana@NETCOM.COM>
Subject:      Re: [Q] Which Scanner for manuscripts
To: Multiple recipients of list IMAGELIB <mailto:IMAGELIB@ARIZVM1.BITNET>

The path thru 35mm slides sounds like a very sound methodology. Wether or
not Photo-CD is nacessary intemediate step seems to depend on the nature of
the project. It seems that CD/digitized imagery has increased the need for
photographic imagery. much the same way digitized textr has increased the
need for printed text. I guess we just can't do away with the slide library,
eiter.

- Ray Lauzzana

• Next message: Rochester Public Library: "Request for advice"
• Previous message: Robert Rosenberg: "Re: Resolution of devices"
• Maybe in reply to: Vineet Jain: "[Q] Which Scanner for manuscripts"
• Next in thread: Robert Rosenberg: "Re: [Q] Which Scanner for manuscripts"