Re: Resolution, Pixel color depth,

Raymond Lauzzana (mailto:lauzzana@NETCOM.COM)
Sun, 21 Aug 1994 09:03:57 -0700

Message-Id: <mailto:199408211607.LAA08521@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Sun, 21 Aug 1994 09:03:57 -0700
From: Raymond Lauzzana <mailto:lauzzana@NETCOM.COM>
Subject:      Re: Resolution, Pixel color depth,
To: Multiple recipients of list IMAGELIB <mailto:IMAGELIB@ARIZVM1.BITNET>

I would also like to raise at least one other thorny issue regarding the
recording of archival documents. Folks from Kodak & Fuji are welcome to
jump in anytime that they wish. ---- We have for about a century accepted
Maxwellian tr-color recording (RGB)/(MCY) color photography. It is well
acknowledged that this kind of recording is a major compromice on the color
spectrum. It looks good to the average person and in particular does a good
job on flesh tones so it has become widely accepted for the recording of visual
material. However, this kind of recording hevily weights the reds and indeed
records some infra-red information. It records little or no UV.

There are older means of photography , such as the Lippman process, which due /do not rely on the spectral characterisics of dyes for their color imaging. They simply record spectra.

Now, that we have sophisticated elctronic spectrum analysers, computers, all of this memery and what not. Whay aren't we recording spectral images? Is anyone out there developing spectral cameras? Or are we forever condemned to the Maxwellian compromise?

- Ray Lauzzana