Re: Back-up/Archiving

Mike Betz (mailto:betz@WLN.COM)
Thu, 17 Aug 1995 07:01:38 -0700

Message-Id: <mailto:199508171410.JAA17312@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Thu, 17 Aug 1995 07:01:38 -0700
From: Mike Betz <mailto:betz@WLN.COM>
Subject:      Re: Back-up/Archiving
To: Multiple recipients of list IMAGELIB

NARA uses 9 track tapes to store files in their electronic archives.
Reason are that it is a known technology, the limitation of the media are
well understood, and the tape drives are available allowing for access to
information over time.

Mike Betz

On Wed, 16 Aug 1995, Alan Newman wrote:

> >Would it be more feasable to do back-up/archiving on a tape system or the
> >new CDR system? I understand that the CDR has a 100 year life and is
> >relatively inexpensive. The unit is quite portable and runs at the low end
> >about $1500.00 for a 2X. Thanks for the
> >input..
> >
>
>
> Archival issues aside, tape can cost as little as $2/gig where CDR costs
> $5-10 for 1/2GIG. There's a stackloading DAT drive which will be available
> from APS that can backup 32gig on a network...it will cost under $2,300.
> Of course, with tape, you're not on-line.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Alan Newman, Executive Director tel. 312 443-7247
> Imaging & Technical Services fax. 312 443-0849
> The Art Institute of Chicago Internet: mailto:anewman@artic.edu
> 111 S. Michigan Ave. Applelink: ARTINST
> Chicago IL 60603 America Online: ARTINST
>