Minolta vs Nikon scanners

George Holmes (mailto:george.holmes@MAIL.UTEXAS.EDU)
Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:09:18 -0600

Message-Id: <mailto:199512192014.OAA15118@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Tue, 19 Dec 1995 14:09:18 -0600
From: George Holmes <mailto:george.holmes@MAIL.UTEXAS.EDU>
Subject:      Minolta vs Nikon scanners
To: Multiple recipients of list IMAGELIB

        Has anyone had the experience of using or obtaining the straight
dope on the Minolta Quickscan 35 versus the Nikon Super CoolScan????

As near as I can figure out they are about the same, except that the Minolta is less expensive. Does this hold true doing actual scanning?

George Holmes MSGT-Ret./USAF Photographer/Imaging Specialist Archer M Huntington Art Gallery 23rd & San Jacinto Street The University of Texas Austin, Texas 78712 Ph# 512.471.9194 Fax#512.471.7023 "The only time you have to be successful is the last time you try."

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~**~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~