Message-Id: <199712042006.NAA24196@dns.ccit.arizona.edu> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 15:01:27 -0500 From: Bob Henneberger <mailto:bhennebe@ARCHES.UGA.EDU> Subject: Re: Microfilm processor question To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
We've been using a Kodak Prostar tabletop processor for the past 15 years and have been satisfied. They are a bit costly, but have been very durable.On Thu, 4 Dec 1997 10:54:22 -0800 John Blunden <mailto:blunden2@LLNL.GOV> wrote:
> My organization is currently scanning large volumes of documents and there
> is a mandated requirement to also create microfilm records for archival
> use. We will not be able to utilize a vendor but will be forced to produce
> and process this material ourselves due to proprietary and classification
> problems. We have inherited a device to write the files to film but my
> question is: who makes a good, low production, and self contained processor
> for 35mm? I would like to see something with a small footprint, minimum
> wiring/plumbing requirements if possible.
>
> Anybody have info???
Bob Henneberger Head, Computer,Hardware,Imaging and Preservation Services University of Georgia Libraries Phone: 706-542-2131 Fax: 706-542-4144 email: mailto:bhennebe@uga.edu