Re: Film scanners

From: Reed Hutchinson (macreed@UCLA.EDU)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 20:40:47 CST


Message-Id: <200112210240.fBL2enP02713@sitelicense.arizona.edu>
Date:         Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:40:47 -0800
From: Reed Hutchinson <mailto:macreed@UCLA.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Film scanners
To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU


<pre>
>Greetings -
>
>In response to my request for info regarding film scanners, someone asked:
>
> >What size are your negatives?
>
>The negatives would be 35mm.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Ted Shaw

We have been using the Nikon 4000 slide scanner for several months now and it does well.

If you have uncut rolls of film, they have an adapter which will allow you to scan them all automatically, as well as an auto feeder attachment for Mounted Slides.

If, as with many negatives, they're in strips, Nikon has a holder to accommodate those as well.

The Digital ICE software which Nikon utilizes does do a nice job of cleaning up the average dust spots and imperfections that would normally require retouching.

The BIG caveat however is that the Digital ICE software only seems to work with "Color" images (Transparency & Negative) and _Not_ with Black & White, at least not with B&W transparencies. They take on a very posterized look if processed with the Digital ICE. I'm assuming the Digital ICE software needs color information to perform its feats...Lacking that, it's at a loss.

I've also used a Kodak RFS 3570 scanner for about 5 years now. It does a very nice job as well, although it's a manual operation as far as feeding in the negs and transparencies - With a large collection you'll probably want to automate the process as much as possible.

Hope this helps,

Reed Hutchinson Principal Photographer UCLA Digital Imaging Services mailto:<imaging@ucla.edu>

</pre>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 20 2001 - 20:48:48 CST