Re: digital scanning camera

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: mailto:cf12@CORNELL.EDU: "sites for obtaining graphics tools"
• Previous message: Dick Vaughan: "Photo Archives Software Needed"
• Maybe in reply to: Sherry Byrne: "digital scanning camera"
• Next in thread: DOUGLAS FORD REA: "Re: digital scanning camera"

Message-Id: <mailto:199502100217.UAA04947@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Thu, 9 Feb 1995 13:22:50 -0800
From: Robert MacKimmie <mailto:rm@CALIFHISTSOC.ORG>
Subject:      Re: digital scanning camera
To: Multiple recipients of list IMAGELIB

Low resolution anything, especially the hand held cameras don't cut
the mustard, as it were.

>From practical experience... Do it right the first time and save

yourself the labor that will be expended when you rescan. Cheap and
dirty doesn't fly in the digital world.

Robert MacKimmie
Curatorial Director of Photography
California Historical Society, San Francisco

mailto:RM@califhistsoc.org

• Next message: mailto:cf12@CORNELL.EDU: "sites for obtaining graphics tools"
• Previous message: Dick Vaughan: "Photo Archives Software Needed"
• Maybe in reply to: Sherry Byrne: "digital scanning camera"
• Next in thread: DOUGLAS FORD REA: "Re: digital scanning camera"