Message-Id: <199802060811.BAA51480@dns.ccit.arizona.edu> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:09:05 +0100 From: Emil Levine <mailto:E.Levine@IAEA.ORG> Subject: Re: RLG standards To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
What are the RLG standards? I don't know if this is a factor of cost. We have a $25,000 Fujitsu 3099 and still get skew which we clean up painlessly during routine enhancement.Suggest you look at Anne Kenney's book on QC.
Emil Levine Head, INIS Clearinghouse UN/IAEA/INIS PO Box 100 Vienna Austria A1400 43-1-2060-22880/29882 fax mailto:e.levine@iaea.org
>----------
>From: Mark Allan[SMTP:mailto:mallan@LIB.NMSU.EDU]
>Sent: Thursday, 05 February 1998 20:55
>To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
>Subject: RLG standards
>
>I recently talked to a person who is not a subscriber to this list, but has
>some background in imaging technologies. He stated that most of the
>equipment out there does not meet RLG standards with regard to digitizing
>microfilm, particularly due to film skew. Is this currently the case, and if
>there is equipment conforming to said standards, is anybody willing to float
>me their favorite products? Also, on the low end of the price range, does
>Screen Scan conform to these standards?
>
>
>Mark A. Allan
>Reference/Social Science/Outreach Librarian
>New Mexico State University
mailto:>mallan@lib.nmsu.edu >