Message-Id: <199802252009.NAA36298@dns.ccit.arizona.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:08:40 -0800 From: Terry Abraham <mailto:tabraham@UIDAHO.EDU> Subject: Re: Scanners: another question To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
We have used the Microtek Scanmaker III for glass negatives without problems of that sort. The transparency adapter on the Scanmaker actually rides up to compensate for overly thick items, but I do not recall that a glass negative causes that behavior.Terry Abraham Head, Special Collections and Archives
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Terry Abraham Special Collections U of Idaho mailto:tabraham@uidaho.edu |
+-----------<http://www.lib.uidaho.edu/special-collections/>----------+
On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, darren umney wrote:
> Is anybody using scanners for glass negatives? I was told by an Agfa
> agent that the Horizon couldn't deal with the thickness because it put
> it's lamps out of phase (or something like that) but that the Linotype
> Ultras (and the UMAX Mirages) could. Anyone?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Darren Umney
>
> Societe Jersiaise Photographic Archive
> Jersey, CI, UK
> mailto:dazzer@itl.net
>