hardware: scanners

From: David Adams (David.Adams@NATLIB.GOVT.NZ)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2002 - 13:56:38 CST

  • Next message: Kristine R. Brancolini: "U.S. Steel Gary Works Photograph Collection" 

    Message-Id: <200202041957.g14JvgF29433@sitelicense.arizona.edu>
Date:         Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:56:38 +1300
From: David Adams <mailto:David.Adams@NATLIB.GOVT.NZ>
Subject:      hardware: scanners
To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU

    <pre> I understand drum scanners perform the best, but we have 'invested' in a Heidelberg Nexscan F4100 and more than pleased ith the results from this scanner. It can also be used for glass negs (drum scanners don't score well on that!) and the optical density of the scanner is v ry good.

    >>> mailto:KKraus27@AOL.COM 02/05/02 04:58 >>>
    --part1_26.22a6a318.299009af_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    A colleague working with transparencies of William Blake's illuminated prints has asked me to inquire about the best transparency scanners on the market right now. Any advice?

    Many thanks,

    Kari Kraus University of Rochester mailto:kkru@mail.rochester.edu mailto:kkraus27@aol.com

    --part1_26.22a6a318.299009af_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    <HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>A colleague working with transparencies of William Blake's illuminated pr nts has asked me to inquire about the best transparency scanners on the market right now. &nbsp;Any advice?
    <BR>
    <BR>Many thanks,
    <BR>
    <BR>Kari Kraus
    <BR>University of Rochester
    <BR>mailto:kkru@mail.rochester.edu
    <BR>mailto:kkraus27@aol.com
    <BR></FONT></HTML>

    --part1_26.22a6a318.299009af_boundary--

    </pre>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 04 2002 - 14:00:42 CST