Message-Id: <200202211510.g1LFA1005674@sitelicense.arizona.edu> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:07:20 -0500 From: Eileen Mathias <mailto:mathias@ACNATSCI.ORG> Subject: Re: dedicated slide/film scanners To: mailto:IMAGELIB@listserv.arizona.edu
<pre>
Larry:
We just purchased a Nikon Super Coolscan 4000 ED, because of recommendations from a colleague. We have only had it for
weeks, but I have been impressed with the results. The 4000 only does 35mm film. The 8000 does other film formats. M
colleague says that the automatic slide feeder (the Nikon SF200S Auto Slide Feeder) jams if more than 10 slides are loa
ed at once. I have not loaded more than 10 slides, but thus far have had no problems. The SF200 slide feeder is an opt
on, not included with purchase of the Super Coolscan.
Color is very good, with a dynamic range of 4.2 (excellent for capturing detail in the shadows). Resolution (4000dpi) i
great, especially if you need to print the image on poster-sized paper. The software is generally user friendly.
My colleague says that the Digital ICE 3 works very well. It does not perform miracles, but is more than adequate and i
certainly better than removing dust and artifacts from an image manually, through image editing.
Eileen Mathias
Eileen C. Mathias
Information Services Librarian &
Coordinator, Albert M Greenfield Digital
Imaging Center for Collections
Ewell Sale Stewart Library
The Academy of Natural Sciences
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway
Philadelphia, PA 19103
215-299-1140
215-299-1144 FAX
mailto:mathias@acnatsci.org
>>> mailto:lrw5@PSU.EDU 02/20/02 05:57PM >>>
Colleagues,
The Preservation department at Penn State University Libraries is looking
at purchasing a dedicated slide/film scanner. Our interest is in scanning
35 mm slides primarily, but we would like to allow for other transparent
formats and, if possible, automatic slide feeders. The choices that we're
reviewing include:
Canon FS4000US
Minolta Dimage Scan Multi II or Multi Pro
Nikon Super Coolscan 4000Ed or Coolscan 8000
Polaroid SprintScan 120
I was wondering if anyone has and is using any of these scanners, how well
the hardware and software lives up to the claims, and your experiences with
them (good and bad). Also, any tales about the Digital ICE3 software would
be appreciated. Feel free to respond directly to my e-mail address
mailto:(lrw5@psu.edu); I appreciate any and all information.
Many thanks in advance!
--Larry Wentzel
--Digital Preservation Coordinator
--Penn State University Libraries
</pre>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 21 2002 - 09:12:38 CST