Message-Id: <199706060430.VAA285886@dns.ccit.arizona.edu> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 00:29:32 -0400 From: "Robert A. Baron" <mailto:rabaron@PIPELINE.COM> Subject: Re: 4x6? 5x7? 8x10? To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
At 08:39 AM 6/6/97 +1000, J Brasher wrote: >Better to scan from the negative - better still to scan from 4x5" negs, but
>35m still quite good. Jennifer
Curious how things change. In my student days, 35mm negs were considered unpublishable, 4x5 were okay for publications and 8x10 (and larger: 16x20s) were considered reference prints. When you bought an 8x10 print from a museum, more likely than not, it was a contact print.
R.Baron mailto:rabaron@pipeline.com