Message-Id: <mailto:199503082210.QAA10768@library.wustl.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 1995 17:07:05 -0500 From: mailto:JREYNOLDS@GUVAX.ACC.GEORGETOWN.EDU> Subject: Re: Req. Info on Microtek Scanmaker III To: Multiple recipients of list IMAGELIB
I asked a similar question on the Photoshop list. I was leaning heavily toward the Microtek III becasue of the review in PC MAG Feb. 7, 1995 and becasue of its features, but the photoshop crowd panned it uniformly on poor performance and non-existent support. Since the H-P IIcx is down to $750 locally, I expect we are going to stick to it.Jon Reynolds Georgetown University Archives