Re: Epson Scanners

From: Keith Morgan (kamorgan@UNITY.NCSU.EDU)
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 15:19:01 CST

Next message: Sue Rosoff: "Re: apologies from me"

Previous message: Sue Rosoff: "Re: Epson Scanners"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Message-Id: <200203062120.g26LKqG00013@sitelicense.arizona.edu>
Date:         Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:19:01 -0500
From: Keith Morgan <mailto:kamorgan@UNITY.NCSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Epson Scanners
To: mailto:IMAGELIB@listserv.arizona.edu

<pre> on 3/6/02 3:49 PM, Sue Rosoff at mailto:foto_zelda@YAHOO.COM wrote:
>
> I will also weigh in on the side of Epson - we have an Epson 1600 with
> transparency adapter for the glass plate project I am working on for the
> Marshallese Cultural Center. I am very pleased with the results. Here at work
> we have a Linotype-Hell flatbed that I am not enamoured with at all and it is
> supposed to be a superior product..

Ditto on Epson. In our Digital Media Lab we have both UMAX and Epson scanners. The UMAX is great but the Epson is the favorite. More bang for the buck too.

Keith

Keith Morgan Digital Library Initiatives North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 27695-7111 E-mail: mailto:Keith_Morgan@ncsu.edu http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/dli/

</pre>

Next message: Sue Rosoff: "Re: apologies from me"
Previous message: Sue Rosoff: "Re: Epson Scanners"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 06 2002 - 15:35:23 CST