Re: HP Scanners

From: deirdre sharp (D.N.Sharp@uea.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Mar 08 2002 - 03:18:03 CST

  • Next message: LAVINA VELASCO: "Re: HP Scanners" 

    Message-Id: <200203080920.g289K5G09178@sitelicense.arizona.edu>
Date:         Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:18:03 +0000
From: deirdre sharp <mailto:D.N.Sharp@uea.ac.uk>
Subject:      Re: HP Scanners
To: mailto:IMAGELIB@listserv.arizona.edu

    <pre> Lavina

    We use both criteria, plus openness of the system (i.e. as non-proprietory as possible). No formal guidelines.

    Deirdre On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:13:46 -0500 LAVINA VELASCO mailto:<LVELASCO@JHUCCP.ORG> wrote:

    > Thanks to everyone for the feedback! You suggestions and comments were
    > helpful.
    > Another question - what guidelines do you use for evaluating the
    > quality of a scanner? Do you judge the quality by what you see and what
    > you can test using the monitor or do you also rely on prints (made from
    > the scans) to validate what you see? Any formal guidelines anyone uses?
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Lavina Velasco, Photoshare Librarian
    > www.jhuccp.org/mmc/photoshare
    > Media/Materials Clearinghouse
    > Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs
    > 111 Market Place, Suite 310
    > Baltimore, MD 21202
    > Phone: 410-659-6280
    > Fax: 410-659-6266
    > Email: mailto:lvelasco@jhuccp.org

    ---------------------- deirdre sharp mailto:d.n.sharp@uea.ac.uk

    </pre>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 08 2002 - 03:22:44 CST