Re: SCANNING RESOLUTION

Matthew Gilmore - DC Pub. Lib (mailto:mgilmore@CAPCON.NET)
Thu, 4 May 1995 16:34:02 -0400

Message-Id: <mailto:199505042037.PAA13849@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Thu, 4 May 1995 16:34:02 -0400
From: "Matthew Gilmore - DC Pub. Lib" <mailto:mgilmore@CAPCON.NET>
Subject:      Re: SCANNING RESOLUTION
To: Multiple recipients of list IMAGELIB

Why scan first?
We discussed this at the USNP meetings--microfilm first then scan from
film.
You lose so much data in the translation to digital.

According to Tanya Brun: . . We have started a project here at Brandeis scanning papers from the Andrei . Sakharov Archives. The materials in the archives consist of typescript, . manuscripts, and some photos. We are scanning at 400 dpi resolution in . grayscale primarily, with some materials in color. We are using 400 dpi . resolution with the intent that microfilm can be produced from the . digitized images in the future. . We are interested in hearing from others whether 400 dpi 8-bit grayscale . and color images are considered sufficient for this purpose, or whether we . should increase our scan resolution to say 600 dpi grayscale and true color . for preservation-quality microfilm. Any recommendation will be appreciated. . . Tanya Brun . Archive Assistant . The Andrei Sakharov Archives . Goldfarb Library . Brandeis University .

Matthew Gilmore mailto:mgilmore@capcon.net

D.C. Public Library Washingtoniana Division 202.727.1213

________Celebrating the Bicentennial of the District of Columbia________ 1791-2002 * * *