Re: Microfilm

Matthew Gilmore - DC Pub. Lib (mailto:mgilmore@CAPCON.NET)
Fri, 5 May 1995 09:48:25 -0400

Message-Id: <mailto:199505051352.IAA12837@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Fri, 5 May 1995 09:48:25 -0400
From: "Matthew Gilmore - DC Pub. Lib" <mailto:mgilmore@CAPCON.NET>
Subject:      Re: Microfilm
To: Multiple recipients of list IMAGELIB

According to Owen:
.
. >One more voice in the microfilm/data for 500 years.  Bits and bytes 50 years
. >from now? ever try to find an 8" floppy drive? Lose the right bit or two, and
. >the whole file is unreadable - a bit of microfilm "measles" and you still
. >can read the image.  I think 50 years from now we'll still be converting
. >information from microfilm for access; still filming for _preservation_
. >
. >Bob Henneberger                      INTERNET:mailto:bhennebe@uga.cc.uga.edu
. >Computer Services                    WWW:scarlett.libs.uga.edu
. >Preservation services                Compu$erv:73727,2615
. >University of Georgia Libaries       Voice: 706-542-2131
. >Athens, GA 30602                     FAX: 706-542-4144
.
.
. Microfile vs Electronic imaging:  This is beginning to sound like
.
. MAC vs PC, Ford vs Chevy, etc etc.  Lets just do it the way it
. fits best for each of us, and in 500 years we can see who was right.

No, it does not sound like that. There are distinct rationales for microfilming--retaining the analog data--set against digitizing. Please don't trivialize it.

. . . Owen. . . . /********************************************************************\ . |Owen Mitz, President, Somerset Systems, Inc (301)-657-3393 | . |Specializing in Imaging, Optical Publishing, BPR and Large Databases| . \********************************************************************/ .

Matthew Gilmore mailto:mgilmore@capcon.net

D.C. Public Library Washingtoniana Division 202.727.1213

________Celebrating the Bicentennial of the District of Columbia________ 1791-2002 * * *