Message-Id: <200005091815.LAA23060@dns.ccit.arizona.edu> Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 19:58:58 +0200 From: Emil Levine <mailto:emil.levine@CHELLO.AT> Subject: An alternative to filming To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
<pre>
Whynot scan and then use the images to produce microfilm. A number of
companies provide this capability. We are using it at the United Nations in
Vienna.
Emil Levine
----- Original Message -----
From: Jerome Skapof, Ed.D <mailto:skapof@SOVER.NET>
To: <mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: hybrid microfilm cameras/scanners
> In response to Julie Bullock's post regarding hybrid systems for capturing
> microfilm. We have access to an automated system that uses the Jenoptik
LOS
> (formally Kontron) ProgRes 3012. This unit is integrated in Denmark. For
> further info try www.academicimaging.com.
>
> Jerome Skapof, Ed.D
> 802-362-3169 mailto:skapof@sover.net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IMAGELIB [mailto:mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU]On Behalf Of Julie
> Bullock
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 12:27 PM
> To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
> Subject: hybrid microfilm cameras/scanners
>
>
> First, I apologize to list members who receive this as a cross-posting.
>
> I would very much like to know if there would be a manufacturer of a
> 35mm microfilm camera/scanner other than the Zeutschel. I know that
> Kodak makes a 16mm one, but I have to be able to prove that the
> Zeutschel is unique before initiating a purchase order. Local vendors I
> polled did not know of another similar product, but they also had not
> heard about the Zeutschel hybrid camera/scanner, which makes me
> cautious. If anyone could give me any additional information about the
> current state of the market I would be most grateful.
>
> Sincerely,
> Julie Bullock
> Archival Reformatting Unit
> Mississippi Department of Archives and History
> mailto:jbullock@mdah.state.ms.us
</pre>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 09 2000 - 13:20:05 CDT