Re: Scanning rare books, digital capture

Trudy Levy (mailto:iminteg@SIRIUS.COM)
Mon, 11 Nov 1996 10:27:27 -0800

Message-Id: <199611111834.MAA04527@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Mon, 11 Nov 1996 10:27:27 -0800
From: Trudy Levy <mailto:iminteg@SIRIUS.COM>
Subject:      Re: Scanning rare books, digital capture
To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU

Joel -
I am always looking for someone who might be doing something similar to
myself in this rapidly evolving field.  I consult to organizations who want
to convert their film libraries to digital libraries.  I am primarily
intereested in the storage and retrieval, although I come from the imaging
and design background.  Are you in the document imaging field or camera
film/digital?
Like to hear what you do and if we have any overlap
Trudy

>Yes. For similar situations to this I have advised people to use a
>digital camera and preferably a dedicated copy stand. Using a linear
>array camera will yield the highest resolution (some will yield up to a
>7000 X 7000 pixel image which equals or exceeds film resolution). The
>dedicated stands make life much easier and if you get a model with
>trans-illumination you now also have a film scanner. This is often a good
>way to justify the costs. You have a camera for 3-D objects as well as a
>scanner for books, flat art, transparencies, negatives, etc. Bear in mind
>also, that as a rule, a GOOD digital camera will yield better results
>than using film and scanning it. The generational quality of digital
>capture is often overlooked as are some of the other benefits such as
>dynamic range, color accuracy, and general flexibility.
>
>Joel Wolfson
>Imaging Consulting & Services
>3610 N. Stone Crest Street
>Flagstaff, AZ 86004-6811
>Phone: (520) 526-3726
>E-mail: mailto:digiwolf@infomagic.com

Trudy Levy Image Integration mailto:iminteg@sirius.com