Message-Id: <199710081556.IAA37056@dns.ccit.arizona.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 21:01:43 +0500 From: "Mr. Chakravarty Debashish." <mailto:debasis@MINING.IITKGP.ERNET.IN> Subject: Re: . Digitization standards To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
Hi,May I knowa few more details about the "DIGITAL IMAGING FOR LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES by Anne Kenney" -- it is made available by which publishers, is it electronically available (via e-mail etc.)
Thanks,
Debashish.
************************************************* * DEBASHISH CHAKRAVARTY * * E-mail: mailto:debasis@mining.iitkgp.ernet.in * * RESEARCH SCHOLAR * * IIT KGP INDIA * *************************************************
On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Emil Levine wrote:
> >Suggest you get copy of DIGITAL IMAGING FOR LIBRARIES AND ARCHIVES by Anne
> >Kenney.
>
>
> Emil Levine
> Head, INIS Clearinghouse
> UN/IAEA/INIS
> PO Box 100
> Vienna Austria
> 43-1-2060-22880/29882 fax
> mailto:e.levine@iaea.org
>
> >
> >----------
> >From: Mike Levy[SMTP:mailto:MLEVY@SFPL.LIB.CA.US]
> >Sent: Tuesday, 07 October 1997 01:47
> >To: mailto:IMAGELIB@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
> >Subject: Digitization standards
> >
> >Dear Image Libs,
> >
> >Has there been a standard established to define what the d.p.i.
> >for a "preservation quality" b&w photographic image should be if
> >digitized in 256 grays? I'm specifically asking about an uncompressed
> >archival version of the scanned file. I've read suggestions which
> >range from 300 to 600 d.p.i. and I'm interested in what others
> >are doing, specifically, those that do their scanning in-house.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Mike Levy
> >Multimedia Department
> >San Francisco Public Library
> >(415)557-4416
> >
> >