Re: Re[2]: yet another charter revision

Heath Rezabek (mailto:hrezabek@FIAT.GSLIS.UTEXAS.EDU)
Thu, 1 Feb 1996 12:04:44 -0600

Message-Id: <199602011819.MAA16066@library.wustl.edu>
Date:         Thu, 1 Feb 1996 12:04:44 -0600
From: Heath Rezabek <mailto:hrezabek@FIAT.GSLIS.UTEXAS.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Re[2]: yet another charter revision
To: Multiple recipients of list WEBCAT-L <mailto:WEBCAT-L@WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU>

On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, R M Heery wrote:

> And if that is so, would it be helpful to remove the words bibliographic
> control records (and all that implies) from the first sentence of the URC
> charter? and leave 'configuration control records' ....

For what it's worth, another phrase gaining currency in the LIS/IS world is Archival Control & Archival Control records. I've only seen it a few times in the literature, but I have seen it. Ah, semantics... :)

Heath M Rezabek mailto:hrezabek@fiat.gslis.utexas.edu http://www.gslis.utexas.edu/~hrezabek/index.html GSLIS Masters Candidate University of Texas at Austin Technical Staff Assistant Perry-Castaneda Library EIC