From: Jeff Huestis <mailto:Jeff-Huestis@library.wustl.edu> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 14:00:50 -0600 (CST) To: mailto:listmgr@library.wustl.edu Subject: Re: Re[2]: yet another charter revision (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 18:59:37 -0600 (CST) From: (Sender of message unknown) To: WEBCAT-L LIST <mailto:WEBCAT-L@WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU> Subject: Re: Re[2]: yet another charter revision
I'm going to take a leap of faith and infer that the cross-posted messages in this thread are coming from the URC list, and that the charter referred to is the same as:
http://www.acl.lanl.gov/URC/charter.html
While cross-postings may be helpful in getting a new list going, I think a forwarded copy of the original posting with a little explanatory lead-in text would be helpful as we try to organize the universe of discourse, decide what belongs in this as opposed to other web-intersect-library lists, etc.
Do we need to talk about related lists?
Jeff Huestis
On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, Heath Rezabek wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, R M Heery wrote:
>
> > And if that is so, would it be helpful to remove the words bibliographic
> > control records (and all that implies) from the first sentence of the URC
> > charter? and leave 'configuration control records' ....
>
> For what it's worth, another phrase gaining currency in the LIS/IS world
> is Archival Control & Archival Control records. I've only seen it a few
> times in the literature, but I have seen it. Ah, semantics... :)
>
>
> Heath M Rezabek mailto:hrezabek@fiat.gslis.utexas.edu
> http://www.gslis.utexas.edu/~hrezabek/index.html
> GSLIS Masters Candidate University of Texas at Austin
> Technical Staff Assistant Perry-Castaneda Library EIC
>